Even though radicalized religious extremist have targeted
groups of children before – i.e. the Beslan School Siege back in 2004 – does the recent
Ariana Grande Manchester concert attack represent a new low for such terror
attacks?
By: Ringo Bones
The tragic May 22, 2017 suicide bombing of Ariana Grande’s
Manchester Arena concert by a 22-year-old British Muslim named Salman Abedi who
detonated a shrapnel-laden improvised explosive device (IED) at the exit of the
arena after the event. The brazen attack had resulted in the deaths of 23
adults and children, including Abedi and 116 were injured, some critically. At
the latest stage of the ongoing investigation, Abedi was suspected of working
within a terrorist network and 16 people so far were arrested in connection with
the incident, two of which are released without charge.
Even though Abedi has been under surveillance by the UK’s
anti terror intelligence agencies since 2015 after he threatened a local imam
for preaching against the so-called Islamic State, he managed to “flew under
the radar” so to speak and managed not to raise red flags. Hours after the
suicide bombing, initial investigations suggests that Abedi might be
self-radicalized. A few days ago, critical evidence has been uncovered that
Abedi could be part of a still unidentified terror network following the furor
over vital forensic photos that were leaked to the New York Times that angered
Home Secretary Amber Rudd that resulted in a temporary halt of intelligence
sharing by the UK’s intelligence services and the US government.
A tribute concert by Ariana Grande has already been
scheduled later for the benefit of the victims and the families of the tragic
Manchester Arena attack. And as a sign of resilience, concert events and a
marathon scheduled after the Ariana Grande concert were allowed to proceed
albeit under heightened security.